Combined analysis of drawdown and recovery data from a constant-rate pumping test in a nonleaky confined aquifer using Theis (1935) type-curve solution (data from USBR 1995). |

Analysis of data from recovery test with Agarwal method using Theis (1935) type-curve solution (data from USBR 1995). |

Analysis of displacement measured during a sinusoidal variable-rate pumping test in which the rate varied through several cycles of extraction and injection (Rasmussen et al. 2003). |

Distance-drawdown analysis for three observation wells monitored during a constant-rate pumping test in a leaky confined aquifer (USBR 1995). |

Analysis of overdamped multi-well slug test in a confined aquifer using KGS Model (Hyder et al. 1994); data from Butler (1998). |

Analysis of underdamped slug test in small-diameter well with frictional well loss in a high-K aquifer (Butler 2002). |

Analysis of slug test data exhibiting double straight-line effect in well screened across the water table using Bouwer and Rice (1976) method. |

Estimation of aquifer properties by matching Jacob and Lohman (1952) type-curve solution to discharge data from a constant-drawdown test in a nonleaky confined aquifer (data from Lohman 1972). |

Aquifer properties estimated by matching Hantush (1959) solution to recovery data following a constant-drawdown test in a leaky confined aquifer (data from Lohman 1972). |

Analysis of water-table rise (groundwater mound) beneath a rectangular recharge basin using Hantush (1967) solution in AQTESOLV. |

## No comments:

Post a Comment